information aplenty

The Butcher did indeed have rotting meat and a butcher's knife.
That clears the Drunk.

I don't think it necessary condemns the Hunter it just means they were (very loudly) wrong.
Its possible The Monk is lying about being the vigilant. They definitely killed the Butcher and it's the simplest explanation.

The Hunter wrote:I’ve been hunting all the supplies for our dwindling kitchen and you’re gonna try to get me off for why???

Well, there is the secret pantry in my basement.

Until someone can explain the Evil Spirit visiting the Educator, I have to believe he is innocent.

The Farmer wrote:The Butcher did indeed have rotting meat and a butcher's knife.
That clears the Drunk.

I don't think it necessary condemns the Hunter it just means they were (very loudly) wrong.
Its possible The Monk is lying about being the vigilant. They definitely killed the Butcher and it's the simplest explanation.

The kicker is that I was very loudly correct if we are agreeing it’s the drunk and monk working in cahoots

The farmer just cleared the drunk. Time to drop it now.

The Reporter wrote:

The Hunter wrote:

The Aristocrat wrote:Has anyone cleared the Hunter?  I really should have my servants make a list or something.

I can’t remember which night but the jailer said the farmer believe said it wasn’t me. I’ll try to find it

A thousand apologies. The Jailor did follow you to the Farmer’s room on night 4.

Too many notes.

I shall wait to pass judgement on the drunk, as his verification goes one way. But I believe it is probably that the monk is the witch of the Librarians night 2 list.

I think I need to lay off the Monk’s communion wine.

The Librarians list was

One is guilty of
The Butcher
The Drunk
The Hunter

The butcher and the drunk are both cleared by the Farmer. The Hunter by our dear departed Jailor.

Something is not adding up here.

Wait, if the vigilante killed the Butcher, how do we know the Butcher is innocent? Would we find out if the vigilante killed a witch? (But this also depends on us trusting that the Monk is a vigilante) Or an I missing something?

Do we have reason to believe the Educator, it could be the Evil Spirit was simply coming home. His claimed role is easy to fake, especially if he says he stays in his room.

Sorry I have another question, can killers move without killing?

Cancel that…. Switched the librarian and educator

The Youngling wrote:Wait, if the vigilante killed the Butcher, how do we know the Butcher is innocent? Would we find out if the vigilante killed a witch? (But this also depends on us trusting that the Monk is a vigilante) Or an I missing something?

The farmer claims to have assumed the Butchers role as the grave robber. Allegedly it is an innocent role.

The Youngling wrote:Sorry I have another question, can killers move without killing?

It has been done before.

What does a grave robber do??

The claim is take over the role of the deceased.

So has the Farmer revealed what the role is? Sorry I'm very confused there's a lot going on

The Reporter wrote:

The Youngling wrote:Wait, if the vigilante killed the Butcher, how do we know the Butcher is innocent? Would we find out if the vigilante killed a witch? (But this also depends on us trusting that the Monk is a vigilante) Or an I missing something?

The farmer claims to have assumed the Butchers role as the grave robber. Allegedly it is an innocent role.

(Sorry if I’m messing this up more - we are active A LOT tonight)

I thought the FARMER was the grave robber who was able to take the CORONER role to check the butcher?
So wouldn’t that mean that the butcher, drunk, monk, and educator are all tied? (And shoemaker)

Where was it that the farmer said the butcher was grave robber? (If you remember the thread)

The Reporter wrote:

I think I need to lay off the Monk’s communion wine.

The Librarians list was

One is guilty of
The Butcher
The Drunk
The Hunter

The butcher and the drunk are both cleared by the Farmer. The Hunter by our dear departed Jailor.

Something is not adding up here.

Dear Librarian, what do you make of this?

So the coroner can check the items? And that's how we know he had meat and a knife? And the Butcher supposedly was the coroner but now it is the Farmer?

The Aristocrat wrote:Busy night for me.

First, I watched the Reporter visit the Monk.  The Monk lives, so I believe the Reporter can be cleared.

Second, I had dream visions all night long.  I believe the dead were trying to communicate with me.  They told me in limited words that the Tailor was the Coroner, and that the Farmer lied.

If anyone can clear my name and find me innocent, there is much information to unravel.

Double-Splendid.

Sorry I didn't want to clutter the clear thread. But didn't someone say that killers can move without killing? How does this clear then? I don't mean to point fingers, I'm actually this confused.

Hopefully this helps:

Tailor: coroner : find cause of death of victim
Farmer: Graverobber: can assume the role of a deceased person
Drunk: Snoop: can determine the items of any person

The farmer took on the coroner role from the tailor, and saw the causes of death of the tailor (strangled by string) and the butcher (strangled by necklace)
Last night he took on the butcher’s role, which has not been said but is allegedly innocent. In taking these roles, he also takes his items.

The drunk had previously snooped the butcher, and both people found the same items, so both roles are real.

This has become quite the knot, hasn’t it? My role just gives me the list and nothing more, so I don’t believe there is anything concrete I can add.
One of our preconceptions may be incorrect. I keep thinking back to the Evil Spirit, so it is not in the realm of impossibility that witches can visit under very special circumstances, and they even be able to be witnessed in this act. Other than that, I am just as confused as everyone.

Oh okay! Yes this makes sense I think. Sorry it's been awhile and I can't remember what all these roles do.

But if the butcher and the drunk are on the same side then they would know each others items as alibis

Which in turn means the drunk will know the monks items as well (all 3 are witches)
And the educator and shoemaker would make 4 and 5

(Not trying to argue at this point — but if the farmer could tell us the butcher’s role that would be more helpful to me)

The Youngling wrote:

The Aristocrat wrote:Busy night for me.

First, I watched the Reporter visit the Monk.  The Monk lives, so I believe the Reporter can be cleared.

Second, I had dream visions all night long.  I believe the dead were trying to communicate with me.  They told me in limited words that the Tailor was the Coroner, and that the Farmer lied.

If anyone can clear my name and find me innocent, there is much information to unravel.

Double-Splendid.

Sorry I didn't want to clutter the clear thread. But didn't someone say that killers can move without killing? How does this clear then? I don't mean to point fingers, I'm actually this confused.

Nobody said it happens this round. Going by convention, this is enough to clear them in my book.

Wait did the farmer say the butchers role and I just missed it?

The Librarian wrote:This has become quite the knot, hasn’t it?  My role just gives me the list and nothing more, so I don’t believe there is anything concrete I can add.
One of our preconceptions may be incorrect.  I keep thinking back to the Evil Spirit, so it is not in the realm of impossibility that witches can visit under very special circumstances, and they even be able to be witnessed in this act.  Other than that, I am just as confused as everyone.

Dig that hole.

Splendid.