Day 3 Results

Do you make moves any other night Drunk? You should have 3 people's worth of items by this point which could help prove your innocence.

Yes. The Educator caused me to rip my pants night one disabling me from finding anything. As for last light, though mildly incriminating, I visited The Butcher. The Butcher has rotting meat and A Butcher's Knife.

Well. If the educator indeed blocks that way, then that would mean the drunk had to attempt a move. As he says he ripped his pants. And the only way to know if you are blocked is if you move. Not to mention a murder still happened in the dark of the first night.

This is a good observation by the monk. The only thing making the Drunk a witch is if the Educator is also a witch.

Though, it would be nice to hear from the Educator on some of his activities beyond night one.

I say this, though I can offer no further information myself. The woodcarver could not have killed night one. I got sleepy with the lack of any new scoops nights two and three and forgot to move. Rest assured that I’ve already submitted my move for this evening to avoid this in the future, and I wholeheartedly apologize for going off the record.

This thread just makes me tie the drunk, the monk, and the educator all together as witches. You guys always tend to alibi for one another and by process of elimination from the librarian it would HAVE to be the drunk………

Or you, or the butcher. As of moment there is no actual evidence on the drunk. Your name is on that list

And I know I’m innocent because I said exactly where I went each night.

What were your moves nights 1 2 and 3?

Ahem. As I was saying before my words got cut off (technical issues). So far the drunk has at least offered information, and his information on me is true. The butcher is an odd witch kill. And if it isn't the butcher, that makes you far more suspicious in my eyes as you've been gung ho with lynching from the get go with no evidence.
If I am to lynch anyone, I'd like more information or evidence.

Love how you still didn’t answer the question

The Monk wrote:Ahem. As I was saying before my words got cut off (technical issues). So far the drunk has at least offered information, and his information on me is true. The butcher is an odd witch kill. And if it isn't the butcher, that makes you far more suspicious in my eyes as you've been gung ho with lynching from the get go with no evidence.
If I am to lynch anyone, I'd like more information or evidence.

I literally gave my entire evidence/reasoning considering if there were 3 listed, 1 died (most likely innocent killed by witch), I AM innocent, and the librarian says at least one has to be guilty then that ONLY leaves the drunk. That’s complete evidence ????? Who else would it be

The ability to protect oneself unlikely, Sir Hunter. There are other abilities which might allow it while still offering a sense of protection, so unless you come out as a trapper/bomber of sorts (which for the record murderer teams love since you tend to do more damage than good) you still have explaining to do.

Splendid.

The Aristocrat wrote:The ability to protect oneself unlikely, Sir Hunter.  There are other abilities which might allow it while still offering a sense of protection, so unless you come out as a trapper/bomber of sorts (which for the record murderer teams love since you tend to do more damage than good) you still have explaining to do.

Splendid.

I have to disagree here. It is not unheard of for traditional protector roles to have the option of protecting themselves. Although I must add that there is often some limit to this ability to prevent continuous self-protection. We truly don’t know what we are dealing with here.

If the Hunter can be verified somehow, then I believe that makes the innkeeper innocent as well. Because if I recall correctly they said it was impossible for the hunter to kill one of the nights. So either or technically.

Also, has anyone heard from youngling? The little one hasn't spoken for the day, unless I missed it.

AGAIN — LOVE HOW YOU STILL DIDNT ANSWER MY QUESTION @MONK

WHERE DID YOU GO NIGHTS 1 2 AND 3

The reason I'm not answering is because I've come to the conclusion it's simply best to engage with you minimally. In small doses. Like at confession, mass, and communion. Patience is a virtue

Lol so you’re a witch we love it

The Jailer wrote:I can confirm the innocence of the farmer, as I do believe he visited the tailor this evening.

** here

The Innkeeper wrote:As far as I know, the Hunter is not responsible for the murders.

Here’s the other one!
Not farmer. Sorry

So no. No reason was given.

Now I’m lost because I thought you wanted to see where I was cleared

The Hunter wrote:Now I’m lost because I thought you wanted to see where I was cleared

With a reason yes. Why did the Innkeeper say this? What evidence was presented? This is good for you, but not really evidence.

Splendid.

Did you miss the jailer one when I went to someone else’s room on a night where someone actually died?????

I’ve moved EVERY night. And the SHOEMAKER and MONK have been doing the killings.

The Hunter wrote:Did you miss the jailer one when I went to someone else’s room on a night where someone actually died?????

Well that one would have been useful to quote.

I DID quote it. YOU can’t read my dear sir!!!!