Butcher was Innocent?

What do you make of this, brother Monk?

That contradicts the list entirely. The drunk successfully verified my items, was definitely blocked by educator meaning he had to try to move. The Hunter was verified as having not been able to kill the one night by the innkeeper who died. So they're most likely innocent as well. Only the butcher was left on the guilty list

I assumed that the she was either a follower or watcher to have known that. But, if she had a different role I'm not sure why she would have defended the hunter.

I'm honestly confused. Though it is the dead board and it's possible the butcher has been lying about innocence there.

If the Butcher's role is for him, vigilante. Which I think he would've claimed after graverobbing. Then that could also mean he's a killer, as a grave robbery of a killer turns the active role into vigilante if I recall some past tomes correctly. The way things are going though it looks more so like the list was fake.

I'd also like to apologize that I post so much

No apologies necessary! I’m the one with spreadsheets with enough words on them to confuse myself many times in one hour!

I think there are two possibilities, one is that the list is fake, one is that the farmer saw the butchers role come in as vigilante and assumed that meant he was innocent, when it’s really just a kill.

Which is what you said, lol. So basically, I agree.

I'm going to be so mad if that list was fake I was stressing about that move so much.